OFDEC (Organization for Food and Drug Exporting Countries) - Proposed

OFDEC to take on OPEC  (Home)
                                      
Contact Your Senator
 
info@ofdec.com           
 
What is Export Tax?
What is OFDEC?
What is Happening to US?
What can we do about it?
Bush visits Saudi King
International Food Prices
Abstract
Unhumanitarian Aid to Africa
Who Killed EV1?
 
Links:
If Brazil and Iran can do it
Brazil's Energy
Food vs. fuel a global myth
Food or Fuel?
Today's Oil Price
Today's Corn Price
Top Fuel Efficient Cars
Top Guzzling Cars
More Gas Guzzling Cars
Salute our Farmers
 
Videos:
 

What is OFDEC?

 

It is collective effort. It is you, the visitor that we depend on to take an action in a hope that we can collectively accomplish our patriotic duty and goal. This would be the perfect way to respond to "Ask not what your country can do for you!" Gibran Khalil. At what price per barrel will you decide to take an action?
Sample Email
Sample Letter

What is happening to us?

 

The oil countries are transferring out our wealth into OPEN nations. Soon we will be just another insignificant nation. There are many combined reasons for the rise of oil prices. What we know for sure is that oil exporting countries are the only winners (beneficiaries from high oil prices) and everyone else is a looser, including us. Most visitors will simply click away. Will you do better?

Call your Senator now!
Sample Letter
Sample Email

What can we do about it?

 

We (US) are a major food exporter. We are exporting food at dirt cheap prices in comparison to oil. We can change this and compete against the OPEC nations head-on and we can win because we hold the most essential resource, food. Please call your Senators, tell them you need them to take an action and refer them to this website. Also, you can send your friends an Email with a link to this website to spread awareness on what we can do collectively. Sample Email.

$75 per Barrel$100 per Barrel$125 Per Barrel$150 Per Barrel$175 per Barrel$200 per Barrel

Abstract

The central premise of this project is to highlight the problem andto offer a solution as a guideline. The final solution may differ in details from what’s suggested below; nevertheless, it is the spirit of this initiative that will remain true to its purpose and its principles and it will inspire ideas that are in line with the goals needed to be attained.

 

The world is an unfair place and while it will remain unfair, we have the responsibility to reduce the level of unfairness that exists in today’s international trade relationship. Fair trade proponents do very little to help marginalized farmers in South America who are a productive part of our global population yet they continue to struggle to survive.

 

The world is an unfair place and while it will remain unfair, we have the responsibility to reduce the level of unfairness that exists in today’s international trade relationship. Fair trade proponents do very little to help marginalized farmers in South America who are a productive part of our global population yet they continue to struggle to survive.

 

In the oil pumping countries they have abundance of oil that is pumped out of the ground with pump meters that literally converting instantly barrels to dollars just like in the gas stations when you see gallons pumped and dollars charged. With oil approaching $200 per barrel these countries might as well be pumping money from the ground and lots of it. The oil price is climbing because the world needs it. All they have to do is pump it out right from the ground and there is no expiration date on it, no processing is involved prior to selling it as crude oil and no spoilage to worry about. It is sold well before it is even pumped out and with fewer middle men to profit from any mark up. Most of the profits go directly to the oil well owners who have taken the ownership of their countries and its natural resources – crude oil.

 

The oil prices have been rising and they will continue to rise to new levels of unfairness year after year until someone does something about it and this is exactly what this article brings forth. It is true that the world needs oil but the world also needs food more than it needs oil, yet food is dirt cheap when compared to crude oil. This is very unfair to the farmers who do not pump food from the ground; they work very hard to produce it. Farmers have to plan, plant, protect from elements, water and fertilize their farms, wait for their plantation to grow and ripen; they must harvest and pack their produce before they can expect any financial rewards for their hard work. And to make things worse, many times they loose their harvest to natural and other elements they have no control over and receive nothing for all their hard work. Even worse, when they loose their harvest they still have to clean up the mess if they plan to start all over again. When the harvest is lost lots of hard work and effort goes waste with no compensation for the invested time, effort, labor and expenses. This is the nature of the game for farmers and they take it with pride. Farmers are our heroes. Many farmers do insure their harvest and get insurance settlement far below what the harvest would have brought them and their premiums usually go up after every incident; further when the farmers loose their harvest the nation loses the GNP that would have been associated with the harvest.

 

We need to regain the global respect for America. We are loosing jobs to the global market. We need to create many new jobs and very quickly. We can do that by going back to basics, farming, farming and farming.  We need to create lots of jobs in farming. The world is starving and they will need our harvest. Farming is the best way to compete with oil demand and oil price increase. We need to level the fields and show more appreciation for our farmers. We need to encourage and support our farmers for they are the true Men of Honor. We need to ensure that they are well rewarded for their efforts. We have the most fertile soil and natural resources in the world. We must go back to farming.

 

When we say farming, we are not suggesting that we all leave our office jobs and go work in the farms; however, for those who would prefer to work in the farms, the farms offer a healthier environment than the office. Increasing or expanding farming in the US could create millions of new jobs in a variety of fields which include technological advancements, capital investments in equipment and machinery, marketing, packaging, transporting, manufacturing in farming supplies and machinery, food manufacturing for domestic consumption and export and a slew of other areas not to mention the trickle down economic effects that will lift the economy in the US in every aspect.

 

We have to educate Americans and teach them to think in long terms. Short term thinking is a luxury and long term thinking is a necessity. After educating Americans thru ads, slogans, campaigns, booklets and most importantly thru schools by introducing new classes that will teach our kids a little about global marketing, jobs, farming and the fact that we have the best natural resources in the world. Finally, we need to take some tough actions.

 

The Oil producing countries have OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) which allows the oil exporting countries to engage in price collusion and/or on collective limit on quantity of oil to be exported – effectively exercising a legal monopoly to keep the oil price high. Say hello to OFDEC (Organization of Food and Drug Exporting Countries). Perhaps it is the right time for America to introduce OFDEC to counter balance OPEC. Given that OPEC already exists it must clinch the argument for OFDEC. OFDEC can be the answer for OPEC. This should be very good news for the American continents especially South America. The American continents can export enough food to feed the entire world population. Our next president should push for OFDEC. This is not a typical trade agreement where Americans stand to lose jobs like some trade agreements may have done. Boldly put, this is simply a price collusion agreement that says we deserve more money for our food and drug that has been serving the world. If they can quadruple their price on oil then why can’t we quadruple our price for food and drugs that they have been depending on for long time?

 

To help rebuild America and to keep it as the world leader we must make some tough decisions like introducing under OFDEC new tariffs on food and drugs export aimed at increasing (adjusting to oil prices) the fair compensation for food and drugs that countries like America export to OPEC countries. Basically, OFDEC would offer non OPEC nations a leverage against OPEC. Without something like OFDEC, OPEC could transfer out the US wealth that took us centuries to build and accumulate thru hard work. All this wealth could be transferred in a very short time if OPEC is left unchallenged by something like OFDEC. The best part of OFDEC is that many nations from South America, Europe Asia and Australia would have everything to gain by joining and everything to lose if they don’t. Who could turn down a leverage against the giant and unfair OPEC? If they could pump money from the oil fields why cannot we get a more fair compensation for our hard work to bring the world food and drugs that is more demanded and more necessary for life than fuel?

 

South American farmers work very hard and long hours all year round to make far less than $10,000 a year while their counter partners in Saudi Arabia make $10,000 per hour or even per minute doing nothing more than watching the gas/dollar meter as it pumps out crude oil from the ground. It is time to correct the exchange value of what is more essential to life than crude oil, food and drugs. By all measures, food and drugs should be worth a lot more than crude oil not only because they are more essential to life than crude oil but also because of the amount of work and care that goes into producing them. Drugs take years of study, research and testing before they are perfected and proven to cure or save lives. It is time to rebel against this unfair value for exchanged goods set by one sided OPEC with no counter organization that demand equal value for food and drugs. This is where OFDEC comes in and creates a balance for the value of exchanged goods – oil vs. food and drugs. Food and drug exporting countries should dump their excess food in the see rather than accepting an insulting offer that could be a tiny fraction of that it is worth. We must challenge OPEC and show them that OFDEC could be bigger, more important and more essential to life. It may be necessary to endure the loss of some excess food supply that must be dumped in the see if necessary (if the compensation for it is not equal it its value or worth). Soon enough, rather thbadly food exporters have been cheated by the unfair value for their food supplyan starving, they will offer ten or even twenty times the previous compensation for our food and drug supply and it will still be cheaper than crude oil. That is how.

 

The units and the tariffs can be studied thoroughly and adjusted as needed and perhaps in response to crude oil price changes; when oil prices go up the tariffs should go up and visa versa. Obviously, this would create a double whammy for the countries that need to import both, oil and food; this issue will be discussed shortly. The success of OFDEC will depend on how many food and drug exporting nations will participate or join OFDEC. Wisdom dictates few rules that are in favor of OFDEC; for example if the US is alone in OFDEC the introduction of OFDEC tariffs by the US and for the US export may discourage nations from importing from the US in the short term only. The shortage that will be created by the lack of US export that will be created by OFDEC tariffs will add to the global food shortage (global food shortage already exists and it is rising) and contribute significantly to global food price increase. In due time, the global food price increase will make the US food prices which include tariffs a bargain when compared to higher global prices. This will be the first victory for OFDEC and it may make OPEC retaliate and raise the crude oil prices further. Canada decides to join OFDEC after recognizing the viability of OFDEC and soon South America will join too seeking an edge in the global market. Europe will have everything to gain from joining OFDEC and it is very likely to join in due time. OPEC and other nations will have to face the reality and make some concessions which may include submitting to OFDEC tariffs, reduce oil prices or do both. China is an agricultural giant that needs oil and it will either join OFDEC or recognize that it is not in their favor to compete with OFDEC to lower food prices – China will be one of the biggest beneficiary of the food price increase caused by OFDEC as they it will have more leverage against OPEC and oil. China and other nations may join OFDEC or possibly form their own version of OFDEC due to political and regional reasons. Whichever way China decides to go it will not conflict with the West or OFDEC as it is very unlikely that it will work compete with OFDEC and lower their food prices giving up a badly needed leverage against OPEC or oil. It would be like Kuwait selling the US oil for $40.00 per barrel when the global market price is at $120.00 per barrel – this has not and is not likely to happen.

 

Billions or trillions of dollars previously unrealized will be added to the US revenues by the tariffs. Part of the new revenues can be used to subsidize oil for the American consumers. The crude oil might be selling for $200 or $300 per barrel while American will be paying under $3 per gallon for gas as the difference would be subsidized from the OFDEC revenues. Part of the revenues can be used to aid the poor countries which may have suffered the double whammy as they struggled to pay more for oil and more for food. These poor counties could receive humanitarian aid from the US in the for of limited food supply, financial aid or both – we will not let poor countries suffer from the global competition they are unable to participate in due to lack of resources. Finally, the rest of the funds will pay for our national debt and other programs. In a global market, when you have winners you more than likely have losers on the other side of the winners. Those trillions or billions of dollars will come not from a vacuum; rather they will be cutting into the trillions of dollars that traditionally went to the oil exporting countries. For the longest time, these countries received by far more than their share of the bounty. Some countries receive more money from oil sale than they knew what to do with – they have been forced to invent new ways to spend some, spend some on over indulge themselves and some use part of these oil revenues to promote global terrorism. Even after over spending as described above they still end up with a giant surplus of revenues. After OFDEC they will probably continue to receive more than their share of the bounty doing nothing to earn it, but you can bet that OFDEC will cut deep into their giant surplus of revenues.

 

The US must recruit as many nations that are not part of OPEC to join OFDEC or these nations will risk a major decline in standards of living caused by crude oil price increase that may continue to rise and it can only be reversed by OFDEC.

 

OPEC may choose to retaliate and challenge OFDEC by cutting off the supply of crude oil to OFDEC nations. If they do this they will only prove us right in that they need our food and drug supply as much if not more than we need their oil. Should they resort to this suicidal strategy then OFDEC should call their bluff. In due time, days or weeks at the most, it will create a major panic turning into major crisis inside the OPEC world and they will be forced to submit to OFDEC. They will have to negotiate for a more fair value for the exchange of goods (food and oil).  They will do whatever it takes to lower the price of crude oil and recognize that food is worth more than oil. As it stands now OPEC is working to keep the oil prices as high as possible. OPEC is emboldened by the global attention crude oils is getting and they will continue to accelerate the upward price until we apply the brake - OFDEC. OFDEC will tell them you cannot do that for we can do the same thing to our food and drugs that we supply you. It is time for food to be recognized as equally important if not even more important than crude oil. In order for OFDEC to be more effective, it must encourage non OPEC nations to join OFDEC. My not too distant ancestors have lived through many famine times where food was exchanged for gold pound for pound. The gold becomes worthless when its owner is about to die from hunger. The stories told about the importance of food in a famine are surreal. Most Americans have no idea what famine is or how bad it could be when it becomes reality.

 

Nothing is without unintended consequences but we will soon become desperate. Should many poor countries suffer further starvation then we can offer them a limited aid. There have always been countries that continue to starve even before OFDEC and we have always offered aid to these countries. It is time for the OPEC nations to think about the poor and the starving countries too just like the US has always done. Starving countries should not be the responsibility of the US only.

 

The OPEC countries and the oil corporations will lobby our congress very hard to prevent the formation of OFDEC. They will introduce new theories, new explanations, campaigns and even ads that will show why we should not promote OFDEC. They will hire skilled people that will use charts and statistics to proof their point. We all know how statistics and charts can be used by skilled people to manipulate their point of view that will be based on theories and nothing but theories. The OFDEC can be so bad to OPEC that they will do everything and anything possible to confuse and blur the vision for OFDEC. They will invent political, theoretical, economical, social and possibly ethical models, reasons or explanations designed to keep the US from forming OFDEC. And when all fails they will stop at nothing to prevent the Congress and/or the house from voting for it. OFDEC opponents may even resort to any form of blackmail if it could help prevent the bill from reaching the floor for a vote. They know that once it hits the floor it is hard to convince everyone to vote against a bill that is good for the nation.

 

One should ask OFDEC opponents where were they when OPEC was being formed? What are they doing to diminish or eliminate OPEC as an international organization that is designed to monopolize oil? What can they do to lower the price of oil?  Why are they trying so hard to eliminate OFDEC as the anti OPEC? Are they trying to defend OPEC? Do they not want the US to have a strategy that is designed to counter OPEC?

 

Opponents of OFDEC know how bad it can be for OPEC that they will try so hard to keep it from forming. One measure we can use to see the potential of OFDEC is through the hard work of its opponents – they must be so committed to killing it because they will be afraid of it potential success which could signal the end of OPEC supremacy. There is light at the end of the tunnel.


 
 

 

Unhumanitarian Aid to Africa

 

The aid given to Africa, as difficult as it may sound to hear, is an unhumanitarian aid. Africa's population today is about one billion people. Africa has the biggest population growth that is about 4% a year. This region is plagued with suffering, disease, virus, famine, drought and all kinds of wars - political, economical and religious wars. History has proven that these wars will go on for long time as they are millennia old.  If we keep aiding Africa, by 2050, we will have five billion people that will be a lot worse off and more dependent on our aid that might not be there.  Africans do not have a system like the Chinese where they limit their own population over growth. Perhaps we can learn to think that current African wars, famine and drought, can play a natural overgrowth protection system. In 2050, instead of having five billion suffering Africans, we may have about one to two billions. In light of the above sufferings, do you still think we are offering Africa a humanitarian aid or an un-humanitarian aid?